Big Red Button
19 Apr 2005 EWriter 0 comments
19 Apr 2005 EWriter 0 comments
The New Yorker: The Talk of the Town:
The New Yorker has, in my opinion, the best Op-Ed writing of just about any publication in the United States. Point that firepower against the Champion Supreme of the “Most Frightening Politician” Award, Senator Tom DeLay, and you have one nice read. If we are not careful, Senator DeLay may undo 100 years of progress in just a few short terms.
This is a great read.
19 Apr 2005 EWriter 0 comments
I am just going to put a couple of these things out there and see what YOU think. It is time for you to put your thinking caps on.
Yesterday, Tom DeLay (God-wielding Republican from Texas, and taker of bribes, and the Republican Leader in Congress–setting an example for other Republicans), addressed the NRA at their annual convention. Appraently, he was pretty subdued and went on to say that non-2nd Amendment supporters were just people who did not grow up with guns. It intimated in the times article that he was one of the people who were NOT bashing Democrats.
What he did say, however, was pretty interesting . . . .
DeLay went on to assure the NRA he would work to pass legislation to continue to guarantee the right to have guns.
“It isn’t just ourselves and our homes that need defending, it’s freedom, ladies and gentlemen, freedom, freedom,” he said. “God gives it, the Constitution guarantees it and together we will defend it. God bless the NRA.”
God and guns? A very interesting concept–it sounds like an argument being used in the Middle East right now AGAINST US and our troops. It reminds me of the crusades.
To counteract my oversimplification of the issue to a mere “God and guns,” I wanted to mix the constitution into the cauldron. The actual 2nd Amendment to the Constitution says the following:
Does the NRA actually serve that purpose? And should they be (or are they already) “blessed by God?” What do you think?
17 Apr 2005 EWriter 0 comments
The New York Times > Science > Space & Cosmos > To Revive Shuttle, NASA Calls on a Cool Leader
This is a great personality profile of the Commander of the next Space Shuttle flight into space, Col. Eileen M. Collins. Personally, I am glad that we are pushing the Space Shuttle program into a new dimension (but lament the loss of life that was the catalyst).
In the last two years, NASA has reduced the number and thickness of the tiles on the underside of the shuttle (making it less fragile), built a repair kit/refined techniques for in-space repairs, and developed a new rolling maneuver for docking that will allow space station crew members to photograph the underside of the shuttle as it docks. Then, while at the station, they will be able to inspect and repair any potential damage while at the station.
17 Apr 2005 EWriter 0 comments
The New York Times > Washington > Change to the Clean Air Act Is Built Into New Energy Bill:
If it becomes law, it would make one of the most significant changes to the Clean Air Act in 15 years, allowing communities whose air pollution comes from hundreds of miles away to delay meeting national air quality standards until their offending neighbors clean up their own air.”
I love symbols. Symbolism. Figurative representations of the literal. Metaphors. Perhaps it is the writer in me. Perhaps it is the reader. Regardless of its origins, this single clause buried in a piece of legislation set my metaphor-detecting nerves buzzing. After reading the article (which was written with obvious bias against the legislation), I found myself smirking at the situation. Let me give a little re-count, as I see it:
This clause is not intended to help communities. It is the inappropriate use of Government to intervene on behalf of corporations–of big business. It is an attempt to undermine accountability to the laws of the United States. When I was a small child, I learned about accountability, also known as consequences. If you put your hand on the burner, you get burned. If you steal a cookie from the jar, you get in trouble. As an adult, the same concept applies. If you do not pay your taxes, you get fined or go to jail. If you break a law, you go to jail.
The small businesses of our country must comply with regulations. If you wanted to start a small Photography Lab, you would have to install the special filters and heavy-metal collectors to ensure that you were not leaving chemicals into the environment. If you were a small garage, you would have to account for all of your waste oil and antifreeze–most likely, you would have to contract with an approved recycling company. In many cases, small businesses cannot leave the lids of their dumpsters open because of the pollutants they may release. And, while our small businesses are meeting the codes and regulations, Representative Joe L. Barton and other politicians are legislating exceptions for big businesses. If you provide a bunch of jobs for our community, I will work on your behalf to lessen the rules you have to follow.
This clause is unacceptable. Perhaps, Representative Joe L. Barton could add a clause to something else. He could amend “By the People, For the People.” His new version could read, “By the People, For the Corporation.”
16 Apr 2005 EWriter 0 comments
The New York Times > Washington > Frist Set to Use Religious Stage on Judicial Issue:
“‘As the liberal, anti-Christian dogma of the left has been repudiated in almost every recent election, the courts have become the last great bastion for liberalism,’ Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council and organizer of the telecast, wrote in a message on the group’s Web site. ‘For years activist courts, aided by liberal interest groups like the A.C.L.U., have been quietly working under the veil of the judiciary, like thieves in the night, to rob us of our Christian heritage and our religious freedoms.'”
I did a quick Google search on the Family Research Council, and one of first hits was their entry into the “Right Wing Watch” section of the People for The American Way website. You can read their review of the FRC here.
If you don’t have time to read it, here are a few quotes (with references) that just might make your nerves bristle–a bit:
Are you concerned, yet? I am. This delusional organization apparently has the ear of our Congress, and even the President. I imagine the President of this group is feeding everyone in the organization the placebo kool-aid until the time is just right . . . .
With a little bit more research, I found a backlog of FRC newsletters. These are older newsletters, from 1994 – 1995, but clearly they support my earlier claim that they have the ear of our politicians.
The entire newsletter (April 1995) can be read here.
Even though the 104th Congress has been in session less that 100 days, its members are already moving at break-neck speed on an ambitious agenda. Focus on the Family and FRC cosponsored this Congressional breakfast to offer the members moral support and to acquaint them with our extensive public policy resources. Jim and I had no idea how many Congressmen would come– or how many would duck out early for official business. The competition was heavy! On the morning of our breakfast six other events were taking place, including a speech by House Speaker Newt Gingrich.
You can imagine our surprise when, despite the competition, 34 members joined us to discuss the issues. On top of that, nearly all of these Congressmen and women– all but one of them in their first or second terms– stayed through the duration of the breakfast. In fact, they remained until well after its scheduled end to ask us questions about issues from school prayer to welfare reform. Many had tears in their eyes as Dr. Dobson spoke eloquently about the sanctity of life. I urged them to fight for lower taxes and less government but also to deal with family breakdown and the flight from values. One after another, the Congressmen made it clear they were counting on FRC to provide them with the research they need on these issues.
9:30 A.M. MEETING WITH REPUBLICAN NATIONAL
CHAIRMAN HALEY BARBOUR
After breakfast, Jim and I walked over to the headquarters of the Republican National Committee to meet with Chairman Haley Barbour — at his request. Dr. Dobson and I have always been willing to meet with representatives of either major party– or anyone else for that matter– to promote the pro-family agenda.
The meeting was interesting. As they say in diplomatic circles, there was a frank exchange of views. Haley was upset because Dr. Dobson and I had publicly questioned why pro-abortion, pro-gay- rights New Jersey Governor Christine Todd Whitman was chosen to deliver the Republican response to the President’s State of the Union address. He had also gotten word of my letter to Newt Gingrich describing the disturbing actions she has taken in her first year in office. In the letter, we cited her opposition to teaching abstinence and her yearly proclamation of “Freedom of Choice Day” to honor abortion.
The letter concluded:
You have literally dozens of highly qualified men and women who could have stepped forward and effectively made the case for the vision you personally have articulated– a vision that clearly emphasizes the values component of the crisis this nation faces. Instead, you have made a selection that ignores that vision and that instead raises a red flag to social conservatives.
Haley claimed that Gov. Whitman’s focus on taxes and the economy– with no mention of family issues– was all the occasion required. Jim and I made it clear to him that both FRC and Focus on the Family would speak up whenever and wherever pro-family policies are at stake. Silence in the face of crisis is surrender, and the American family today is surely in crisis.
11:00 A.M. PRESS CONFERENCE,
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE NEWT GINGRICH
The next stop was just off the floor of the House chamber in the Capitol. Jim and I, along with former Congressman Bob McEwen, slipped into the Speaker’s daily press briefing. We watched the usual lively exchange between the Speaker and the press. When it was over, Speaker Gingrich interrupted his packed schedule and invited us to meet with him in his personal office.
As we walked through the halls of the Capitol past the historical statues of American heros, I reflected on how much is at stake as the battle for the family rages on. Our Founders knew only a virtuous people could remain free. Washington still seems unable to grasp that fact.
Gingrich has tremendous pressures on him. The Speaker is second (after the Vice President) in succession to the Presidency, but he is the post powerful legislator in the Congress. As we moved through the Capitol, cameras flashed and tourists pointed at the face that has suddenly become one of the most recognizable in the land.
Our meeting with the Speaker was brief, as expected. As you can imagine, the subject mentioned above came up. So, too, did many of the items in the Republican Contract with America. Jim and I praised the key provisions of the Contract designed to provide pro-family tax relief, encourage adoption, and limit government intrusion in the family. We spoke just as candidly, however, of the moral decay gripping America, and the increasing sense among the people that our nation is off course. The Speaker’s response was encouraging. But we made it clear that rhetoric wasn’t enough. There must be action on the pro-family, pro-life agenda.
12:00 P.M. HOUSE DINING ROOM
The accessibility of members of the House can surprise visitors to the Capitol. After leaving the Speaker’s office, Jim and I had lunch in the House Dining Room. Members have priority there, but the public is served as well. As we enjoyed lunch, members of Congress from both parties stopped by to talk. It was clear to us that the 104th Congress is full of men and women who want to do the right thing by this land we love. Time will tell if they remain true to their mission.
1:30 P.M. FRC OFFICES AND A BATTLE ROYAL
Our next stop was our “home away from home,” FRC’s offices located in Washington’s business district between the Capitol and the White House. I sat in while Jim taped a future radio broadcast based on the day’s events. He wanted to record his impressions while they were fresh.
But on this day, I didn’t have long to reflect on what I’d heard. Events in Washington move too swiftly for that. Instead, my staff was fully engaged in news of the President’s imminent announcement of his choice for Surgeon General of the United States. Because of that office’s focus on teenage pregnancy and other sensitive issues, FRC had followed this decision closely. We were among the earliest and most persistent voices calling for the removal of its previous occupant, Dr. Joycelyn Elders.
For the remainder of the afternoon, we checked and double- checked our sources on Dr. Henry Foster, Jr. The next day, as rumored, President Clinton officially nominated him as Surgeon General. Before the announcement, our press release had been circulated across Washington and on Capitol Hill. Before nightfall, I had done two network news interviews on the nomination and the air waves were full of FRC’s information that Dr. Foster was a Planned Parenthood leader, and an ardent champion of abortion on demand and school- based clinics.
Overnight, a nomination that seemed a sure thing was headed for serious trouble, all because of the painstaking work of the outstanding staff at FRC.
Of course, every day at FRC isn’t as full and exciting as this one was. I shared this much detail with you about a single day because I wanted you to feel a part of it– because surely you are. Nothing we accomplish here would be possible without your steady and heartfelt support.
Finally, let me close with the most important part of the day. After hours of meetings and conversations with the power brokers of Washington, I jumped in my car for the usual 15- mile drive home. That drive is a good prayer time for me and that night was no exception. I thanked God for the opportunities he has given us in Washington, and for this great country that I hope will become a “shining city upon a hill” as our Founders intended. As I pulled into my driveway, I also thanked him for our faithful supporters and for the family that was waiting for me on the other side of the door. Within minutes, Washington seemed far away. I was submerged in the real news of the day– homework assignments, test grades, gymnastics competitions and the inevitable discussion of how many vegetables have to be eaten to justify dessert.
Washington and its committees are important. I promise you I will continue to represent you before the powers that be. But I am reminded very night that the most important decisions in America each day take place around the dinner table, not in Congressional hearing rooms. FRC and I will always fight for your family and for the values that are essential if this experiment in self- government is to survive.
They live and work close to Washington, they are getting meetings with our Legislators (and have been for at least 10 years), and they have funding. Watch these people. Their messages of hate and discrimination wrapped in a gauze of religion DO NOT reflect my beliefs. Be wary of the Family Research Council.
15 Apr 2005 EWriter 0 comments
The New York Times > Business > Business Special > Citigroup’s Earnings Rise 3%, Bolstered by Consumer Banking: “The company’s revenue increased 6 percent, to $21.5 billion, from $20.3 billion a year earlier, as a result of substantial growth in its transaction services and retail banking businesses, especially in Asia and the United States, as well as private equity investment gains.”
Like I was saying yesterday about the passing the of the Corporations-against-poor-people-anti-bankruptcy Legislation. The third largest creditor in the country has increased profits by 6%. And now, thanks to our Congress, we really have a shot at doubling that number. Those guys up at Capitol Hill are really exemplary team players. Go team!
15 Apr 2005 EWriter 0 comments
Yahoo! News – Abortion Clinics on Edge After Manifesto: “Abortion Clinics on Edge After Manifesto”
Apparently, there are a few of us that have not progressed as a civilization beyond antiquity. These few culturally inept still believe that it is acceptable to meet force with equal force. This freak who was BOMBING abortion clinics actually believes that he is justified in killing the people who work in abortion clinics (or who use them) “because abortion is murder.” This is the most wobbly soap-box I have ever seen.
In a recent translation of the epic poem “Beowulf” there is an applicable theme to our abhorrent tale. For those of you who do not know, or for those who might need a memory trigger, “Beowulf” is an oral poem passed on by the bards about the Nordic battles and heroes of old. It was recorded in writing (some believe as early as 600 A.D.) and surfaced as a manuscript around 1200 A.D. Some people think that it is a dry tale, and others believe that it is a great story of battles, and heroes, and swords, etc. Obviously, I am in the latter group.
In a recent translation by Seamus Heaney, I detected an element of sarcasm that none of the other translators surfaced. At one point, the poet lamented the current situation–that the social rules require each of the societies to destroy generations to pay back the “Weirguild”–or, man-price. If someone in your family was murdered, then you can extract either cash in the equivalent of that person’s “Weirguild” (determined by their social rank), OR you could kill an equal value person in THEIR family. It was the equivalent concept to the “Eye for an Eye” of biblical times.
Absolutely NOT! Right now, we call them extremists, but I have a different argument. There is an entire sub-culture that is as unforgiving and misguided as him. Abortion Bomber’s core belief is that he has the ability (or, perhaps DUTY) to destroy the people who do not agree with him. Now, who else can I think of who feels that way? Who, in our world, behaves like that?
I don’t want to point any fingers, but . . . there is this country over in the Middle East that we are giving Democracy right now. And, it was kind of, sort of, NOT their idea. I know that their idea of the world was WRONG and all, but . . . .
And, then there is the state of Oregon who actually REVOKED same-sex marriage licenses today. Talk about feeling duped! You are really not married, or recognized, or anything. I hope they get their processing fee back . . . .
Our abhorrent Abortion Bomber stands on the same philosophical ground as the homophobes passing legislation in our government, as the war-mongers who are giving democracy to Iraq, and ANYONE who thinks that if you do not believe in their god, you are going to their hell.
If I remember correctly, Jesus was a pretty tolerant guy, but maybe that is just my interpretation of the bible.
14 Apr 2005 EWriter 0 comments
Yahoo! News – Congress Passes Bankruptcy Reform Bill: “Congress Passes Bankruptcy Reform Bill”
Of Course they passed the bankrupcy reform bill. Of Course President Bush was “eager” to sign the legislation. Has he ever HAD a credit card bill in his entire life? I remember in college. I was earning about $200 less per month than I needed to live. And guess where it came from for a year, or so: YUP–my credit cards.
To our fearless leader, he thinks that credit cards are something you use to NOT CARRY CASH. They certainly are not something people “live on.” “This is a good thing for business (my base) . . . I am sure that thought rummaged around there, somewhere–pending verification that there was any brain activity at all.
I am certainly NOT advocating that it is acceptable to not pay your bills. I am, however, questioning the representation of the our government. The people who made this decision are the “haves.” How many legislators come from rich families? How many have earned their money? How many of them have lived from paycheck-to-paycheck at ANY POINT in their lives?
My understanding is that the majority of Bankrupcies are caused by Medical Bills and procedures–NOT from people buying too many electronic devices at Best Buy. Actually, now that I think about it–coupled with the recent court ruling that stated that [Americans] are not entitled to low-cost medicine, and a history of legislation that consistenly chooses the profits of the companies over the people receiving the care–it would seem to me that Darwinism is no longer a valid theory for our society.
This is an extermination of the middle and lower classes. Only the rich will survive.
14 Apr 2005 EWriter 0 comments
I have had the wind knocked out of my lungs by this thing (figuratively AND literally). See for yourself.
http://www.thebattleforamerica.com/
Anyone want to talk about it–leave a comment.
14 Apr 2005 EWriter 0 comments